![]() Windows Virtual Desktop (WVD) was an Azure-based service for virtualizing Microsoft’s Windows operating systems (OSs) that provided virtualized applications and desktops in the cloud, primarily for enterprise users. ![]() Important points of comparison between these two solutions include flexibility, image management, application delivery, and cost. On the other hand, CVAD offers a broader range of options since it’s been in the virtualization market longer. This design is generally known as VDI, although many people use this term to refer to any desktop virtualization implementation.ĪVD is directly integrated into Microsoft Azure Resource Manager, enabling easier automation with simpler management. ![]() It usually involves the server hosting multiple instances of desktop operating system instances by running a hypervisor, an architecture originally derived from a Multiwin engine developed by Citrix and licensed by Microsoft. While a variety of vendors have implementations of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI), we are going to compare Microsoft’s VDI solution (Azure Virtual Desktop) to Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops (CVAD) as this is what people commonly refer to when they say VDI.ĭesktop virtualization typically takes place in a client/server environment where applications and data remain on a remote server, while a local thin client only receives keyboard, video, and mouse (KVM) information. ![]() Ever since the introduction of Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD), also formerly known as Windows Virtual Desktop (WVD), we often get asked what the main differences between this solution and Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) are. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |